Manchester United criticized by Carragher for inexplicable £200m call that exposed Amorim

Jamie Carragher has hit out at Manchester United co-owners Sir Jim Ratcliffe and INEOS over their shocking decisions that put Ruben Amorum at risk.

Amorim was appointed to replace Erik ten Hague on a two-and-a-half-year contract in November, but hopes of him making an immediate positive change have already faded.

The Portuguese have lost five of their first 11 games and pipped Manchester United to 14th place. Premier League table And seven points clear of the bottom three, to be in a relegation battle.

But the ‘mess’ can really only be blamed on those who sacked Erik ten Hag a few months into the season and created a philosophy centered around the formation of the squad before this via a hilarious summer job review. supported by badly unsuitable for

Jamie Carragher thinks. Manchester United ‘Perhaps he found the right man for the job and hired him at the worst possible time’.

‘The club hierarchy has a lot to answer for,’ he writes. His latest column for the Daily Telegraph. It makes sense to set an important goal as soon as possible.

‘What’s hard to explain: how can you give a lame duck coach a £200m budget who plays 4-2-3-1 four months before recruiting a manager who plays three centre-backs and wing-backs? ? ‘

Amorim has already rejected suggestions that he should show more tactical flexibility rather than forcing an inconsistent squad into his preferred 3-4-3 system, saying he was “selling his idea”. Yes, it would be worse if I kept changing all the time.

“But I think they have a lot of difficulties because they spend two years playing one way and now playing another, with so many losses, it’s really difficult for them and you can feel it during the games. “, he added.

More on Manchester United mess from F365
👉 Ten Manchester United forwards for Ruben Amorum’s best January transfer window.
👉 Man Utd have made a ‘terrible misstep’ with Ruben Amorim. This is Roy Hodgson again.
👉 Manchester United’s worst January signing is clear as Madrak is destined for Chelsea’s crown

“Even when we tried to score, it was more from them than the organization. You have to feel it. I have to sell my idea, I can’t get another one.

“If I completely change the system, I don’t know if I’m here to win. You know? If I do that and keep losing, it’s worse. You don’t know, I don’t know.”

Carragher agreed with Amorim, writing: ‘If Amorim switches to a back four in response to United’s results, it will undermine his reason for being there.’

The Sky Sports pundit continued to target those in charge of football affairs: ‘Manchester United executives in charge of football operations are the architects of this mess, not Amorim.’

He then questioned how technical director Jason Wilcox could insist on establishing a “game model” for the team – ‘the same system replicated at every level of the club’ – when ‘you’re a manager. are supporting with such completely different systems. You just got fired?’

And indeed yes, that is very fair.

‘The United hierarchy knew the dangers of asking Amorim to take over immediately because it was clear the current squad was not set up to play his way,’ says Carragher.

‘They have trusted Amorim to do the job but his formation is so inadequate for the staff that all the positive momentum that could have been created, had he gone through a full pre-season and recruiting right-backs. would have given the opportunity. profile, is lost.’

Source link