Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The burden of clubs outside the Gulded Premier League has abandoned the idea of transfer fees beyond the reaction. Make a one -year rolling deals routine.
This is a new season. The fony transfer war is almost over, as far as it is outside the Premier League. This top flight has become a financial arms race, but outside the league and certainly out of the championship, it is barely there.
See the list of signatures; Most deals are debt or free transfer. Occasionally, money changes hands but it is relatively unusual unusual and small quantities.
For example, take Wimbledon: He has signed 13 but no one has attracted the announced fee. They have transferred 14, no one for money.
But there are signs that the transfer madness is also eliminating divisions with Birmingham and Wrexham last season. Plemot has moved to 17 and 12 inches, which has made a profit of $ 1.6 million. Hudders Field transferred and out 27 but for just one fee – Alfie in May 1.4M in May.
To a large extent, it cannot be ahead of Gorjing on the money in the above flight. It is the same game but the financial architecture is quite different. Who, if anyone, does it take advantage of it? Whose interest is it? Knock -on -fees are, but this side, Why is players value when £ 100m says? I know it’s a market price for a high striker. But is that? Only if you say so. There is nothing natural or natural about it. It is just a footballer, suffering from farm and injury loss. There is no guarantee.
This is not really a weapons race unless you work for different governments and increase to sell your own players, but this is annexa for the Premier League clubs. But now, in the way, with these values, you sell a player at £ 100m and you have to spend M 100m to take them and if you don’t need, which mug paid M -100m in the first place?
Is there a different way? Fees inflation is out of control. Wouldn’t it be better if they were not present? Most clubs have practically abandoned the concept of payment transfer. Football has a long transfer culture, though it was never so discriminatory. But since it becomes more and more a culture in which only a few clubs can be involved, has the lower leagues developed a better way to work beyond the need? Nevertheless, you usually transfer only different players to buy and you can still do the same, just what can be tolerated without astronomical fees. If only the expenses were personal terms, would it really be worse? It seems radical but just because we accept this ridiculous system as usual, when it is nothing.
Throughout Europe, most of the transition is already free. Let’s, declare transfer fees illegal.
If someone wants to sell the club, they will. If a player wants to go, he will do it. Only ownership of employment contracts. Is that a good thing? If there were no transition fees, what would be a pure inconvenience? If the players will be free to roam on the rolling contracts. If your club is attractive enough, you will still attract players. I do not see how anything will change except many clubs will not be stopped from doing business and agents will not be expelled from football.
Asak will still move to Liverpool. New Castle will still have to replace her. The only difference is that every club is available to be attracted, rather than who can withstand. It’s better, is it?
With all the contracts, with a one -year rolling arrangement, football can stop becoming a strange employer suffering from strange deals, which almost no other organization has no other organization and adopts traditional methods of pursuing staff through terms and conditions. Reduce the impact of money and it is all less power. Tell me that this will be a bad thing. You can’t It will not appear.
If you want more convincing, what is it good with it? Answer me Has it made football more widely competitive and diverse or do the same rich clubs always win everything? These are clubs, not business. Trying to make a profit by trading in humans smells and has been largely abandoned. Has the sky fell? What can never happen? This is clearly ridiculous, only agents have taken advantage of doing very little but we look at the crazy fees and look at it as they are natural.
The fact is that I think many of you think that it is crazy to abandon the transfer fees and now they are more interested in the transfer than football while they are in favor of hanging inequality, which they encourage inequality, showing that they are happy with their feathers on their feet. Worship all the devils in which they walk.
More than Johnny Nick on F365
👉 👉 The amount before the pre -season is tightly to hit the planet and players
👉 👉 Alexander Asak’s offer from El Hellal is evidence of ‘abuse relationship’
👉 👉 We should not allow ‘fastest, mini animals for Moron’ Barton and men’s games ‘pure, proportional version’.
